Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Agony over ecstasy is helping no one 

Agony over ecstasy is helping no one

Last Friday night, Matthew Chesher, then a senior official of the NSW government and husband of a state minister, was observed by police to have allegedly purchased a tablet of ecstasy. Chesher immediately resigned. His wife issued a statement of regret while also strongly supporting her husband.

This is nonsense on stilts. Scarce police resources have been used for no benefit. These resources are now not available to follow up serious violent crimes. Somebody making an important contribution to government and his family has been made to suffer disproportionately.

We should not follow this anachronistic approach in Australia in 2011. Ten days ago I visited Lisbon, Portugal and saw the drug policy of the future.

Portugal decriminalised low level consumption of illicit drugs in 2001. People found in the course of normal police work to be in possession of small quantities of illicit drugs now have their drugs weighed. If the weight exceeds statutory limits, the person is deemed a ''drug trafficker'' and is referred to criminal justice authorities.

If the weight is under statutory limits, the person is considered either a ''recreational user'' or an ''addict'' and referred for assessment to the Commission for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction, part of the Health Department. Assessment takes a panel of two a couple of hours. Only nine staff are needed to service the entire Lisbon district (population about 1 million). Drug consumption and functional stability are assessed. Functional recreational users are given advice about staying out of trouble. Some are followed up in three to six months' time.

''Dysfunctional addicts'' are referred for help - usually to drug treatment, but some also for healthcare, mental health services or employment assistance. This group is carefully followed up. Sanctions are possible but are rarely used.

The Portuguese argue that the increased funding for drug treatment since 2001 has been just as important as the decriminalisation of drugs. A favourable evaluation of this experience published by the Cato Institute, a US free-market think tank, received considerable international publicity.

Portugal's policy has been operated with little change for almost 10 years by centre-left as well as centre-right governments.

If Chesher had been caught with an ecstasy tablet in Lisbon rather than Sydney, this would have been treated as a private health matter. He would still be employed and paying taxes. His family would have been spared considerable pain. Taxpayers would not have had their funds squandered.

A week ago I attended a meeting of the Global Commission on Drug Policy in Geneva. Members of the commission include the former presidents of Brazil (Cardoso), Colombia (Gaviria), Mexico (Zedillo) and Switzerland (Dreifuss); former US secretary of state George Shultz; former EU foreign secretary Javier Solana; executive director of the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria, Professor Michel Kazatchkine, and Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Airlines. Nine of the commission members attended the meeting.

The commission accepts prohibition has failed comprehensively. It called for an approach that, like Portugal's, treats drugs as a health problem. The Lisbon and Geneva meetings made it clear that significant international drug law reform is now inevitable and that global support for drug law reform is accelerating.

In the August 2010 federal election, for perhaps the first time in Australia, the two candidates for prime minister had admitted previous cannabis use. The US President has admitted previous use of cannabis and cocaine. His predecessor denied cannabis use but was caught on tape admitting it. The previous US president claimed to have smoked cannabis but not inhaled. In November, 46 per cent of Californians voted to tax and regulate cannabis. In Britain, it is estimated that about 50 million ecstasy tablets are consumed a year. Australia could not maintain police or military forces if all new recruits admitting previous illicit drug use were rejected.

It's high time we swept away our cant and hypocrisy on illicit drugs. Let's admit that most people taking illicit drugs do so because they enjoy the experience. Let's make low-level drug use a health and social issue and stop pretending it is a crime.

Alex Wodak is director of the Alcohol and Drug Service at St Vincent's Hospital.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
And he probably gets his funding from the Labor Government.

Illegal drug taking is a crime and it leads to more crime. Stop the grubs selling and using and Australia will be a better place.

Posted by mark, 1/02/2011 9:24:23 AM
There is much less harm to the community from MDMA ecstasy than the legal alcohol drug.

Prohibition helps nobody except the suppliers who can charge more for a product of unknown quality.

Posted by Mackenzie, 1/02/2011 9:27:28 AM
On one hand we have the government having its hand in the Alcohol industries pocket. We all hear and know of the violence that goes with it.

On the other hand you have social drugs and more commonly have a sedate (non violent) outcome but the government can't find the pocket in which to reach.

I know what type of social society I would rather be a part of

Posted by Dirka, 1/02/2011 10:00:05 AM
Prohibition does not work and never has.

Our private prisons (which are funded by tax-payers) profit from incarceration of non-violent drug offenders. Law enforcement gets budgets to fight the 'war on drugs'.

All this money spent and the rates of use have never declined.

The black market thrives under prohibition and children can get a hit of speed easier than they can buy tobacco or alcohol because it's an unregulated system.

The only system that works is legalization, regulation and taxation.

A humble citizen like myself can come to this conclusion but our politicians and law enforcement agencies can't? GIVE ME A BREAK.

It has already been demonstrated that legalization is a more viable model and frees up HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS ANNUALLY in tax-payer funded corrections and law enforcement budgets.

If I had to have a society full of mindless alcoholics that go out to start fights and vandalize every weekend or a society with a bunch of pot smokers that sit around at home with friends talking philosophy I think it's a pretty easy decision.


Posted by Towlie, 1/02/2011 12:41:04 PM
Alex you would have to admit that Singapore's drug laws are a lot more effective at stopping the problems than Portugal's cop out approach. You can walk around Singapore at night without being hassled by drug addled deadbeats, which is a lot more than you can say about Lisbon. Probably the reason Portugal is in its current state, both socially and economically, is because people with views like you have been able to decide public policy. Lets hope our politcians can demonstrate enough sense and not fall for the lethal policy prescription you are pushing.
Posted by John, 1/02/2011 2:49:13 PM
Yep, drug taking is illegal...but 1 tablet leads to the explosion of opinion and invective one way or the other. If he was caught drunk driving it would be over in a day, and he would be at more risk to himself and other road users.

Yes drug taking is bad but for goodness sake get some perspective.

Posted by Stevo, 1/02/2011 3:01:59 PM
Voters need to check the husbands and wives of Labor ministers, and the senior high paid positions they hold.

Our money pays the wages.

Posted by JohnT, 1/02/2011 6:46:31 PM
We should brink back the noose and hang all people on drugs of course we will have to hang half the population of Australia, but that is beside the point damn it !!!


Posted by Hang Em High, 2/02/2011 11:08:44 AM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles




Walcha News







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...